A Response To T Bone's Americana Address: Part1
A couple of thoughts on T Bone Burnett's well
considered keynote address at Americana Fest from this past weekend. Burnett
the winner of a Grammy and an Oscar, as well as having a mile long list of production
credits that range from John Mellencamp to Diana Krall. Burnett, to say the least, is a serious
artist and his address makes the case for the sanctified role of artists
in shaping and pushing societal innovation now and throughout history. He cites for example a man landing on the moon in a Jules Vern novel a hundred years before it
actually happened. However, he feels
today’s artist is in jeopardy due to the shifting technological landscape which
has so upended the music industry's
business model, directly affecting his bottom line. On the encroachment of technology,
he recommends a book: The Technological
Society by Jacques Ellul, and goes on to say:
While I really love that last line: It is our privilege to beat those swords
into plowshares, I am rather unmoved by this argument. We need to face up to
the fact we are a warring people. I wish it weren’t so, but we as a society
have collectively decided that we value the ability to make war above almost
anything else. Save your patronizing 9/11, terrorism and Putin speeches, that’s
not the point. The point is we invest one-third of our resources into the
military. That’s indisputable. And from this investment, besides missile systems,
nuclear subs and all the rest we get microphones, computers and the internet,
which begs the question: What difference does it make where these innovations,
that have so enriched our lives, originated? Is the internet any less valuable
or fun because it came from the military? Sure I would love every climate scientist,
the CDC and computer engineer to have the resources we pour into the military,
but that’s not our reality, it’s not what we value and thus, a moot, irrelevant
point.
John
Wilkinson, the translator, in his 1964 introduction, describes the book this
way- “The Technological Society is a description of the way in which an
autonomous technology is in the process of taking over the traditional values
of every society without exception, subverting and surpassing those values to
produce at last a monolithic world culture in which all technological
difference and variety is mere appearance.” This is the core of the dead
serious challenge we face.
I really disagree with this, especially the part where
he says there’s going to be one monolithic world culture with differences only
in appearance, which is something akin to the right wing’s never ending fear
mongering about Washington taking orders from the UN. I think as Americans, with
all our adventurism and the push back we have received for it, especially over these last
years in the Middle East, we should understand there isn’t much appetite for a monolithic
one world culture. People want to remain autonomous and keep their unique values
and heritage, as evidenced by the never ending strife in Iraq, which forced Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds to live together under one centralized government after WW1. That is not to say the world remains separate and insular with the internet and global economy. We also have a common interest in working together to
solve issues of climate, extreme poverty, displacement of people and a litany
of other issues. Central to solving these problems are technological innovation in the production of energy as well as improvements in
communication, medicine and food production. No doubt technology can have vast unintended
consequences like suburban sprawl, but if managed properly we can use it to
solve problems without jeopardizing our individuality.
Next he goes on to complain about the military origins
of our technology:
Parenthetically,
we have to remember that all this technology we use has been developed by the
war machine- Turing was breaking codes for the spies, Oppenheimer was
theorising and realising weapons. Many of the tools we use in the studio for
recording- microphones and limiters and equalizers and all that- were developed
for the military. It is our privilege to beat those swords into plowshares.
Comments
Post a Comment